Judicial Insights

Huff Appeals Again, As Ballot Chaos Looms

Despite being dealt a decisive blow by Commonwealth Court Judge Lori Dumas—who ruled that Michael Huff is not domiciled in Philadelphia and does not qualify to run for judge—Huff has filed a second appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. This appeal comes just one day after Dumas issued her strongly worded opinion, reaffirming her earlier

Still Off the Ballot: Judge Dumas Reaffirms Huff’s Disqualification Under the Supreme Court’s Broader Standard

Following the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s directive to reevaluate judicial candidate Michael Huff’s residency under a broader legal framework, Judge Lori Dumas has issued her reconsideration—and her conclusion hasn’t changed: Michael Huff is not domiciled in Philadelphia and does not qualify to appear on the ballot. Read the full opinion here. The Huff Test—And Why Huff

Vacated but Not Vindicated: Supreme Court Returns Huff Case to Lower Court

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling in the Michael Huff residency case—and while it vacated the Commonwealth Court’s decision to remove him from the ballot, it did so strictly on procedural grounds. The case now returns to Judge Lori Dumas for expedited reconsideration. A new hearing is not required, and the court has

Judge Dumas Removes Michael Huff from Ballot Over Residency Violation

In one of the most consequential rulings of this year’s judicial election cycle, Commonwealth Court Judge Lori Dumas has removed Michael Huff from the ballot for the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. The court found that Huff does not meet the residency requirement to run for judge in Philadelphia.  Read the full opinion here. The

Scroll to Top